Legal Opinion

Tyson v. Tyson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1904No. 13,343PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Washington county: Charles T. Dickinson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

Peter Tyson died intestate in Washington county; the plaintiff in error is his widow; the. defendant in error, Amasa F. Tyson, is his only child, and had attained his *439majority at the time of Ms father’s death. The other defendant in error is administrator of the estate. On the 15th day of January, 1903, the defendant in error, Tyson, filed a petition in the county court which, so far as is material at present, is as follows:

“The said decedent (referring to the intestate) died seized of the following described lands situated in said Washington county, to wit: The north half of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brandhoefer v. BainNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Guthman v. GuthmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Clemons v. HeelanNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Serry v. CurryNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meisner v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Draper v. ClaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. McManus v. FarrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Swobe v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API