Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bates

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1941No. 30959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtYeager, J.

This is an action by plaintiff, appellee here, against the defendant, appellant here, to recover on an indemnity agreement or agreements for loss claimed to have been sustained by appellee by reason of the fact that appellee claims that it was required to respond in the principal sum of $1,250 indemnity as surety on the bond of Merton O. Bates, county judge of Dawson county, the appellant, and was required to expend the sum of $257.80 for legal services, and $14.16 court costs, in an action against the appellant and appellee, the purpose of which was to recover for default on' the part of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Huffman v. KoppelkomNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  2. State v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Brandhoefer v. BainNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Guthman v. GuthmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. County of Platte v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API