Knina v. Levine & Son
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler,, J.,
Knina, the plaintiff, convinced the jury that he had a bargain with the defendants if he would direct them to some place where they could purchase large quantities of scrap iron and scrap materials they would pay him a commission, which commission in- a subsequent' conversation was fixed at three and one-half per cent. He showed that in pursuance of the information given the defendants bought a large quantity of scrap from the United States Aluminum Company, the corporation designated by him. There ivas sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict for plaintiff but the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- William Zoller Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Ehmling v. D. L. Ward Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Laginsky v. McColloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Lowenstein v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Specktor v. Victory Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Halpern v. Western Pennsylvania Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Oswald MacH. Co. v. Farnsworth EbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Pinkerton's National Detective Agency v. Rosedale Silk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936