Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Lamar County Bd. of Educ.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 24, 1988No. 86-333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Almus Chandler, appeals from a summary judgment for the defendants, Lamar County Board of Education ("the Board") and Don Coker, Superintendent of the Lamar County Board of Education. The circuit court held that the contract Chandler sued upon was void as being against public policy, and thus that Chandler's claim for a portion of certain gas and oil severance tax monies and his claim for the "burned-out school money" was invalid. Additionally, the summary judgment also related to a claim based on allegations of fraudulent inducement to enter into the contract. We reverse and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. East End Memorial Hosp. and Health CentersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Bush v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Hunt v. TestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  4. Houlton v. NicholWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hamaker v. CoonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crimson Industries, Inc. v. KirklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Moore v. Pennsylvania Castle Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Callaway v. EH Smith Elec. Contractors, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  4. Bear Stearns Securities, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API