Legal Opinion
Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Felicetti
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 5, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 92-0643PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association’s (“FidFed”) Motion for Reconsideration of our October 5, 1992 Order in which we granted summary judgment in favor of defendant, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (“F & D”). The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence. Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir.1985).
Plaintiff brought this action against F & D for breach of contract for failure to pay insurance proceeds under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Temple University v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, a Corporation of the State of Maryland v. Hudson United Bank, a Banking Corporation of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- New York Life Insurance Company v. Lawrence T. Johnson, Sr., of the Estate of Kirk Johnson Lawrence T. Johnson, Sr., in His Own RightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- FIDELITY FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN ASS'N v. FelicettiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993