Legal Opinion

Stroh v. Hinchman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1877PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

Ilinchman sued Stroh and Hudson on thirty-eight negotiable promissory notes, thirty-two of which purported to have been made by defendants and endorsed by Richard D. Winsor, three to have been made by Richard 1). Winsor and A. B. Hinman and endorsed by defendants, one to have been made by defendants and endorsed by Winsor and Hinman, one to have been made by Hudson and endorsed by Stroh and Winsor, and one to have been made by defendants and endorsed by Winsor and Hubbard Smith. The defendants pleaded separately by different, attorneys, and denied on oath the execution of the papers, by them…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bibb v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  2. St. John v. RedmondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1839
  3. Weed v. CarpenterNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Winton v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Yonkus v. McKayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People v. McKinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. FuhrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API