Mitchell v. Sessoms Grocery Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill by the wife sought cancellation of a mortgage upon her land on the grounds that it was a mere suretyship -for the husband’s debts contrary to the statute (Code 1923, § 8272), and sought redemption of the land from the mortgage. The wife and the husband were proper parties to the bill. Cudd v. Reynolds, 186 Ala. 207, 65 So. 41; Dewberry v. Bank of Standing Rock, 227 Ala. 484, 150 So. 463; Horst v. Barret, 213 Ala. 173, 177, 104 So. 530.
The recent eases are collected in Dewberry v. Bank of Standing Rock (Ala. Sup.) 150 So. 463; Alabama Farm Bureau Credit Corporation v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Lamkin v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScharnagelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Rollings v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Van Derslice v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Delony v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Garland v. First Nat. Bank of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Continental Life Ins. Co. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Ex Parte LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.