Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Sessoms Grocery Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1933No. 4 Div. 740PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill by the wife sought cancellation of a mortgage upon her land on the grounds that it was a mere suretyship -for the husband’s debts contrary to the statute (Code 1923, § 8272), and sought redemption of the land from the mortgage. The wife and the husband were proper parties to the bill. Cudd v. Reynolds, 186 Ala. 207, 65 So. 41; Dewberry v. Bank of Standing Rock, 227 Ala. 484, 150 So. 463; Horst v. Barret, 213 Ala. 173, 177, 104 So. 530.

The recent eases are collected in Dewberry v. Bank of Standing Rock (Ala. Sup.) 150 So. 463; Alabama Farm Bureau Credit Corporation v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Lamkin v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScharnagelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Rollings v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Van Derslice v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Delony v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Garland v. First Nat. Bank of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Ex Parte LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API