Garland v. First Nat. Bank of Scottsboro
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice;
The bill was to cancel a mortgage by the wife alleging that it was a forbidden surety-ship for the husband’s debts.
The principles of law involved in this case are not complicated and are well understood. The difficulty, if any, is in applying the facts as presented on the trial of the case to the law as established under the statute. Section 8272, Code 1923. It is an elementary principle that the wife shall not directly or indirectly become the surety for the husband, and in the construction of this principle of law, which is statutory, our court has said:
“The statute which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Kelly v. HanwickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Hayden v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Richardson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Hall v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Delony v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Continental Life Ins. Co. v. BrandtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Ex Parte LacySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Clark v. Lineville Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Garland v. First Nat. Bank of ScottsboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.