Legal Opinion

Vasko v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 19, 2013No. 12-370CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Plaintiff; Failure to State a Claim; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Breach of Contract; Takings; Torts; Due Process.

OPINION

HORN, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Carol Ann Vasko, a pro se plaintiff, filed a three-page complaint against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims, alleging a breach of contract and seeking damages “in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars ... and costs and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.” Plaintiffs complaint was accompanied by an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, which the court previously granted. Defendant…

2Cases cited163 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API