State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
Consolidation seeks a writ of mandamus, alleging that the commission abused its discretion in awarding permanent total disability by improperly relying upon Dr. Fierra’s report and by misinterpreting the restrictions contained therein.
In order to successfully challenge an order of the Industrial Commission by mandamus, the relator must demonstrate an abuse of discretion. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 18, 20, 31 OBR 70, 72, 508 N.E.2d 936, 938. If an order is supported by “some evidence,” then there is no abuse of discretion. Id.
In this opinion, we reaffirm…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Waddle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Wallace v. Industrlal CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Kaska v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Kettering Medical Center v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by16 opinions
- State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Jones v. Metrohealth Med. Ctr., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2017
- State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Manpower of Dayton, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.