Legal Opinion
Hoskins, Mayor v. Pitman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 3, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court bt
Judge Dietzman
Reversing. ,
Alleging that at a meeting of the board of council of the city of Pineville held on February 9, 1923, he had been by a resolution duly passed employed to audit certain books of the city, but that through error and oversight no minute of such resolution and employment had ever been made in the records of the council, the ap.pellee on January 26, 1928, brought this suit to require the board of council to enter of record upon its books a nunc pro tunc minute of such resolution and employ raent. The lower court granted the appellee the relief he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auxier v. AuxierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Lancaster Electric Light Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Becker v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
- City of Highland Park v. RekerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Morgan's Administrator v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Princeton v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Frankfort Kentucky Natural Gas Co. v. City of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. City of JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- City of Richmond v. Spangler Apartments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2018
- City of Pikeville v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.