Legal Opinion

State v. Prince

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1930No. 4905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

Defendant was convicted, of extortion. It was charged by the information that the defendant “willfully,” etc., “did extort and obtain from John Eaquinta,” with the consent of Eaquinta, $100, the consent being induced by force and fear, through threats to take his life, and Eaquinta, “then and there being induced solely by reason of said force and fear, did then and there consent” and pay to Prince the sum of $100. Section 8320 of our statute provides:

“Extortion is the obtaining of property from another with his consent, induced by a wrongful use of force or fear, or under color of official…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MortensenUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Commonwealth v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GosselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. People v. Yoshio FutamataSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. Lewis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. State v. RowleyUtah Supreme Court · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API