Legal Opinion

People v. Yoshio Futamata

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 14, 1959No. 19099PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

The defendant in error was the defendant in the trial court in a criminal case in which the charge was rape. Count 1 alleged that the crime was committed by force and violence, whereas Count 2 charged that the defendant had committed the offense by threatening bodily harm to the victim. Trial was to a jury and the verdict was not guilty. The People of the State of Colorado seek review of certain legal questions pursuant to C.R.S. 1953, 39-7-27. They contend that the trial court erred in (1) giving of particular instructions, (2) its rulings on the admission of certain evidence, (3) in its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. MussendenNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. People v. MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. People v. . SchleimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. People v. BorghesiSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. People v. BugarinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API