Legal Opinion

State v. Adkins

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1976No. 40309 and 40310PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrodkey, J.

The county attorney of Platte County has brought consolidated error proceedings pursuant to sections 29-2315.01 to 29-2316, R. R. S. 1943, to test the constitutionality of subsection (1) (g) of section 28-4,127, R. S. Supp., 1974, as contained in the Nebraska Controlled Substances Act. That portion of the statute reads as follows: “(1) It shall be unlawful for any person: * * * (g) To visit or to be in any room, dwelling house, vehicle, or place where any controlled substance is being used contrary to the provisions of sections 28-459 and 28-4,115 to 28-4,142, if the person has knowledge that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. State ex rel. English v. RubackNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. People v. CresseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Conley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. RuzickaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ShiffbauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API