Legal Opinion

State v. Shiffbauer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1977No. 40740PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

Defendant, William Shiffbauer, was found guilty by *807a jury of knowingly or intentionally delivering a substance which he represented to be a controlled substance but which was not in fact such a substance. He was sentenced to 1 year probation and 60 days imprisonment in the Douglas County jail was imposed as one of the conditions of probation. Defendant appealed, alleging four assignments of error: (1) Section 28-4,125(7), R. R. S. 1943, under which he was charged, is violative of fundamental principles of due process; (2) the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; (3) the trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rose v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. McClarityNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. AdkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. GalesNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. TamburanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Interest of SouzaNebraska Supreme Court · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API