Legal Opinion

Titus v. Rorick

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1948No. 10502PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants in 1941 were the owners of some $219,000.00 par value bonds of the-Everglades Drainage District of Florida fjr which, following a default on January 1, 1931, in the payment of interest and matured bonds, appellees H. C. Rorick (now deceased but here represented by the Executors of his estate) and James R. Easton and Joseph R. Grundy (never before *573the court) served as a Protective Committee under a Deposit Agreement dated January 2, 1931, and The Spitzer-Rorick Trust and Savings Bank served as Depositary.

On June 6, 1941, the Protective Committee (herein called…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Rorick v. Board of Comm'rs of Everglades Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Bullard v. City of CiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lebrón v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  2. Lebrón v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API