Legal Opinion

State v. Norman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2002No. 69417-6PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

The defendants in these consolidated cases maintain that the State lacks jurisdiction to prosecute them for alleged crimes committed north of the 49th parallel, as located by present day geographers and surveyors, but south of the international boundary between the United States and Canada. Our state constitution provides that Washington State’s northern boundary in the relevant area is “west along said forty-ninth parallel of north latitude.” Const, art. XXTV, § 1. At the time the United States-Canada border was originally surveyed, prior to Washington’s admission into the Union as a state,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Louisiana v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. New Jersey v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. SlavinWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. York v. Wahkiakum School Dist. No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HatchieWashington Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API