Legal Opinion

Nystrom v. First Nat. Bank of Fresno

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1978No. Civ. 3192PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NAIRN, J. * —

Statement Of The Case

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a summary judgment granted to the defendant in an action for damages for breach of contract. Both sides moved for summary judgment promptly after the case was at issue. Both agreed that the legality or illegality of the letter agreement (see Appendix A, post, at p. 769) was a matter of law and not of fact. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that the agreement sued on was illegal and unenforceable. Plaintiff’s appeal followed.

The record on appeal consists of a clerk’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. California State Employees'assn. v. St. of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Nevada Constructors, Inc. v. Mariposa Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Lowe v. LoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Carl v. EadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Snow v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Gurkewitz v. HabermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Hinman v. Department of Personnel AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Vale v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Wilson v. Household Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API