Legal Opinion
City of Mandan v. Leno
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 2000No. 20000104PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] The City of Mandan appealed from an order suppressing evidence in connection with a charge of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The trial court expanded the limited statutory right to a reasonable opportunity to consult with an attorney by holding the right existed prior to arrest. We reverse and hold the limited statutory right for a reasonable opportunity to consult with an attorney attaches only after arrest. We remand for a factual finding of whether or not Brian Quentin Leno invoked his right to consult with his attorney after…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. VietorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Kuntz v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HawleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Fargo v. WonderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Koehly v. LeviNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Bell v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Gwinner v. VincentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Kasowski v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.