Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Loomis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1948No. Civ. No. 16348Published

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Plaintiff (cross-defendant) appeals from an order denying her motion, under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside an interlocutory decree of divorce granted to cross-complainant. Her notice of appeal also states that she appeals from a ruling denying her motion to set aside a stipulation and a default. The record does not show that there was a ruling denying a motion to set aside a *241stipulation or denying a motion to set aside a default. No default was entered. There was no notice of motion to set aside a stipulation or a default. (The caption of the notice did refer to it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Loomis v. LoomisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. California Real Estate Exchange v. Sequoyah Hills Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API