Loomis v. Loomis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Action for divorce. Defendant answered, and also filed a cross-complaint alleging that plaintiff was not a fit person to have the custody of their 3-year-old child. Plaintiff answered the cross-complaint and denied the allegation that she was not a fit person to have custody of the child. When the case came on for trial on June 26, 1946, a written stipulation of the parties was filed and it provided, among other things, as follows: that the action might be tried on the cross-complaint as a default matter; that “upon the action being so tried as a default action, the Court may award to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Washburn v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- King v. KingAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re Marriage of WellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Priest v. PriestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Morgan v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Shaw v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.