Legal Opinion

D'ANTUONO v. Narragansett Bay Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 19, 1998No. 97-441-AppealPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This motor-vehicle accident case raises the following issue: by approving its insured’s proposed liability settlement with an under-insured tortfeasor without disclaiming the availability of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage, was an insurer thereby estopped from later denying that its policy provided such coverage? Contending that the provisions for UIM coverage in its automobile insurance policy cannot be expanded or negated by the doctrine of estoppel, the defendant-insurer, Narragansett Bay Insurance Company (Narragansett Bay), appeals from a Superior Court judgment entered in…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. DeChristofaro v. MacHalaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. OlivierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  4. Long v. Atlantic PBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. ABCD...Vision, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
  2. Barone v. Christmas Tree ShopSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. Leiter v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Amberleigh HUDSON v. GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., D/B/A GEICO General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
  5. Jeanne Jackson, of the Estate of Anthony J. Esposito, Jr. v. Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API