Legal Opinion
Lower Paxton Township v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1974No. Appeal, No. 526 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion By
Judge Kramer,
This is an appeal by Lower Paxton Township (Township) from an order dated March 20, 1973 of the *137Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) wherein the complaints of the Township and one consumer complainant, George W. Smith (Smith), were dismissed, and the inquiry and investigation of the PUC into the increased rate application of Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Company (Dauphin) was terminated.
This case had its beginning on June 29, 1971 when Dauphin filed a revised tariff providing for rate changes in existing metered rates calculated to produce increased…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Johnstown-Pittsburgh Express, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission & W. C. McQuaide Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co. v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Clemmer v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Middletown Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.