Legal Opinion

Levis-Zukoski Mercantile Co. v. Exchange National Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1901No. 12,234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Butler district court; C. W. Shinn, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The plaintiffs in error sought to charge a bank, as garnishee, by action against it under the provisions of sections 4644 of the General Statutes of 1901, before it had obtained a judgment against the *551principal debtor. The section referred to contains the following:

“No trial shall be had of the garnishee action until the plaintiff shall have judgment in the principal action, and if the defendant have judgment, the garnishee action shall be dismissed with costs.”

After plaintiff in error had introduced its evidence in the proceeding against the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sun Mutual Insurance v. Geo. Seeligson & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Washburn v. New York & Vermont Mining Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1868
  3. Laidlaw v. MorrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Lowry v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Egnatik v. Riverview State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Cooley v. JanesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API