Legal Opinion

Egnatik v. Riverview State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1923No. 24,611PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action by a depositor against a bank to recover a balance claimed to be on deposit. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff and rendered judgment for him'and the defendant has appealed.

Plaintiff alleged that he opened an account in the bank on June 20, 1918, and had made deposits and withdrawn money so that at the time of filing suit on July 31, 1921, he had a balance of $272.45, which the defendant refused to pay him on demand. Defendant answered, admitting the deposits and withdrawals, and averred:

“The defendant also states…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SharittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. HouseleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Ludvickson v. Severy State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Levis-Zukoski Mercantile Co. v. Exchange National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grant v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. United Collieries, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Allan Wayne Morton v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Allan Wayne Morton v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API