Legal Opinion

Francis v. Dana-Cummings

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 6, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Pamela Francis appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Mead, J.) dismissing her three-count complaint against Colleen Dana-Cummings alleging (1) a violation of the Maine Civil Rights Act; (2) trespass; and (3) illegal eviction. Francis asserts that the trial court erred in ruling that the litigation involved an “internal tribal matter.” Because the complaint sets forth a cause of action on all three counts, and because the record is not sufficient to support a determination that the dispute is an internal tribal matter, we vacate the judgment.

I.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Wage Payment LitigationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Great Northern Paper, Inc. v. Penobscot NationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. State v. DhuySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  4. Arsenault v. ArsenaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tomer v. Maine Human Rights CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Francis v. Dana-CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Francis v. Dana-CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  4. Laprel v. GoingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API