Legal Opinion
United States v. Roland Fahnbulleh, United States of America v. Pedro Lnu (Alias) Hugo Collazos
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1984No. 84-1572, 84-1538PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
Roland Fahnbulleh and Hugo Collazos appeal from their conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846 (1982). For reversal, Fahnbulleh and Collazos argue the district court 1 erred in (1) allowing out-of-court statements into evidence; (2) denying a motion to acquit for insufficient proof of conspiracy; (3) denying a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction or venue; (4) denying a motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of their coconspirators; (5) denying a motion for mistrial; and (6) denying a motion for new…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. David Allen Resnick, United States of America v. Mark Dennis JunoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. HelmelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Stanley Carter KiserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. MacklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Thomas Edward Cordova, Frankie Cordova, Harold Leonard DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. McKnightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.