Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Edward Cordova, Frankie Cordova, Harold Leonard Dominguez
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 18, 1998No. 98-1157SD, 98-1158SD and 98-1159SDPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
These consolidated appeals arise out of the Defendants’ convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Harold Leonard Dominguez (“Dominguez”) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, the admission of coconspirators’ statements, and the quantity of drugs attributed to him at sentencing. Thomas Cordova claims that his motion for change of venue should have been granted and he was denied his right to a speedy trial. Frankie Cordova, Dominguez and Thomas Cordova all claim that they were…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ristaino v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Michael BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Kenneth Coleman, United States of America v. Andre Worthy, United States of America v. Orlando WillisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HonkenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States of America v. Edmond Xavier Ramirez, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Anthony ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.