Legal Opinion

Rickle v. Wyoming Valley Paper Mills

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 2, 1944No. 3476PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.

In an equitable proceeding for the cancellation of a particular document on the ground of mistake, the rule that parol evidence is inadmissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument does not obtain. McIsaac v. McMurray, 77 N. H. 466, 469.

“Cancellation is appropriate when there is an apparently valid written agreement or transaction embodied in writing, while in fact, by reason of a mistake of both or one of the parties, either no agreement at all has really been made, since the minds of both parties have failed to meet upon the same matters, or else the agreement of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. Detroit Forging Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huguelet v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Bee v. Chicopee Mfg. Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Robert B. Noble v. Ralph W. FarrisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1955
  4. Carle's Motorcycle Shop, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Carignan v. Amoskeag Hamper Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API