Carignan v. Amoskeag Hamper Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
The plaintiff bases his claim of fraud upon the statement of the insurer in its letter of December 19, 1945 enclosing the first draft and receipt, “we are attaching our draft for compensation due you.” It is argued that the assertion that the draft was due the plaintiff before he had made an election under the Act was false and intended to mislead the plaintiff into thinking that he had but the one remedy. But the statement that compensation was due was correct. “Where total or partial incapacity for work at any gainful employment for not less than one week results to the workmen from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lauze v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
- Eleftherion v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
- Churchill v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Rickle v. Wyoming Valley Paper MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- Davis v. H. P. Cummings Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ream v. WendtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966