Bee v. Chicopee Mfg. Corp.

In support of her general exceptions to the Trial Court’s findings, the plaintiff has argued that the evidence compels findings directly contrary to those made. The defendant has devoted its argument to the proposition that the findings made are warranted by the evidence. If the defendant’s position is correct, the plaintiff’s argument necessarily fails. The sufficiency of the exceptions not having been questioned, the case is considered upon its merits. See, Plante v. Shortell, 92 N. H. 38, 40; Eastman v. Weisman, ante, 253.

Following the accident, the plaintiff continued to work until…