Legal Opinion

In re Reifschneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by Foster L. Backus, special guardian of George Behr, an infant, in reference to the alleged professional misconduct of • Felix Reifschneider, Jr., an attorney and counselor of the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

JENKS, J. :

Supplemental to the record made at Special Term, testimony was offered in our court on behalf of Mr. Reifschneider. Our conclusion justifies the action of the Special Term. In announcing it we add our words of commendation of the course of Mr. Justice Dickey, who presided there.

Mr. Reifschneider did not demean himself well at the reference, where he had the temerity to appear without counsel, although the questions involved were serious to him. In view of adverse facts not to be gainsaid, Mr. Reifschneider, defendant and witness, without counsel, even though a lawyer, failed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Hamilton v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. In the Matter of H____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Herrick v. CatleyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1865
  5. Rochester Bar Association v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Summons v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API