Legal Opinion

Mestas v. Martini

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 26, 1944No. 15,281PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

This action was begun in the district court to compel the specific performance of a contract which the plaintiffs alleged was entered into between them and the defendant, and for certain injunctive relief.

The district court entered its judgment and decree in favor of the plaintiffs, to review which, defendant prosecutes this writ of error. The plaintiffs are Carmela Martini, Harold Ralya, J. M. Jaramillo, Joe Galvan, Emilia Valdez, Joe Martinez, Onofre Romero, Porfiria Martinez, Mrs. Arasimo Balardeta, and Basilio Tenorio, and the defendant is Felix B. Mestas, and the parties' will be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Von Trotha v. BambergerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Knoff v. GraceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  3. Gill v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  4. French v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  5. Riverside Land & Irrigation Co. v. SawyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bill Barrett Corporation v. YMC Royalty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. Soderlun v. Public Service CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. American Mining Co. v. Himrod-Kimball Mines Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. Shull v. SextonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Stice v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API