Legal Opinion
Riverside Land & Irrigation Co. v. Sawyer
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 14, 1913No. 3698PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from Mesa District Court. Hon. Sprigg Shackelford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
Appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, filed February 21, 1910, for a specific performance of an oral agreement, and damages for nonperformance, and on the plaintiff’s election to stand on its complaint, dismissing the suit.
The contract was in substance:
“That the party of the first part, The Riverside Land & Irrigation Company, agrees to and with the party of the second-part, R. H. Sawyer, that for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter to be kept and performed, to transfer to the said party of the second part an option, then held by the said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sternberger v. . McGovernNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Winter v. GeobnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hoehne Ditch Co. v. John Flood Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Mestas v. MartiniSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Wardlaw v. WardlawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Smith v. Des MarteauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Crumley v. SheltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.