Smith v. Carbide and Chemicals Corp.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice SCHRODER.
Pursuant to CR 76.37(1), this Court granted the certification request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to answer the following questions of Kentucky law:
I. Is proof of actual harm required to state a claim for an intentional trespass?
II. If the plaintiffs can prove a diminution in their property values due to an intentional trespass, do they have a right of recovery under Kentucky law?
In certifying the questions of law to this Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit provided a brief explanation of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wood v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Division of American Home ProductsKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Ellison v. R & B CONTRACTING, INC.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
- Rockwell International Corp. v. WilhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
- Hughett v. Caldwell CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Morgan v. Hightower's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Houston Unlimited, Inc. Metal Processing v. Mel Acres RanchTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Powell v. ToshDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Burkhead v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2008
- Dickens v. Oxy Vinyls, LPDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Smith v. Carbide and Chemicals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.