Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Oxy Vinyls, LP

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 1, 2009No. Case No.: 3:06CV-364-HPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, District Judge.

Timothy Dickens, along with seventy-one other named plaintiffs, (“Plaintiffs”), lives on sixty properties in the “Rubber-town” area of Louisville, KY. Oxy Vinyls (“Defendant”) operates a manufacturing facility (the “Oxy Vinyls Facility” or the “Facility”) in that vicinity manufacturing polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Their lawsuit complains of emissions of fallout and noxious odors into the neighborhoods immediately adjacent to the Oxy Vinyls Facility, and asks for injunctive and monetary relief. The Court has provided each side with a full…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Pathways, Inc. v. HammonsKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Lynn Mining Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sean R. v. BMW of North America, LLCNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Combs v. ICG Hazard, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
  3. Adler v. Elk Glenn, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
  4. Hanna v. Motiva Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  5. Barnette v. Grizzly Processing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API