Legal Opinion

Strack v. Strack

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert J. Muller, J.

The parties were married on May 25, 1963 and plaintiff now seeks a divorce based upon the newly enacted no-fault grounds contained within Domestic Relations Law § 170 (7).1 In lieu of an answer, defendant now moves to dismiss the complaint, contending (1) that the complaint lacks specificity (see CPLR 3016 [c]); (2) that the conduct alleged in the complaint is barred *260by the five-year statute of limitations (see Domestic Relations Law § 210 [a]); and (3) that the complaint fails to state a cause of action for divorce under Domestic Relations Law § 170…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. 511 West 232nd Owners Corp. v. Jennifer Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Alonzo M. v. New York City Department of ProbationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. McKilligan v. McKilliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Claim of Collins v. Dukes Plumbing & Sewer Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Townes v. CokerNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Schiffer v. SchifferNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Vahey v. VaheyNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Stancil v. StancilNew York Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Trbovich v. TrbovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API