Townes v. Coker
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert A. Bruno, J.
It is ordered that this motion is decided as follows:
Priscilla Coker (wife) seeks an order: (A) pursuant to CPLR 2221, granting reargument of the denial of wife’s application for attorneys’ fees, pendente lite, sought in action No. 1; (B) upon granting reargument, awarding wife counsel fees, pendente lite in the amount of $40,000; (C) in the alternative, in the context of action No. 2, pursuant to section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law, awarding wife interim counsel fees, pendente lite, in the sum of $40,000 payable by Mr. Townes directly to wife’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bogoni v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Joy v. JoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Caffyn v. CaffynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Mattson v. MattsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Filstein v. BrombergNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- In re the Estate of PerricelliNew York Surrogate's Court · 2012
- Alvarado v. AlvaradoNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- Stancil v. StancilNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- King v. State of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.