Legal Opinion

Townes v. Coker

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert A. Bruno, J.

It is ordered that this motion is decided as follows:

Priscilla Coker (wife) seeks an order: (A) pursuant to CPLR 2221, granting reargument of the denial of wife’s application for attorneys’ fees, pendente lite, sought in action No. 1; (B) upon granting reargument, awarding wife counsel fees, pendente lite in the amount of $40,000; (C) in the alternative, in the context of action No. 2, pursuant to section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law, awarding wife interim counsel fees, pendente lite, in the sum of $40,000 payable by Mr. Townes directly to wife’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pajak v. PajakNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Bogoni v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Joy v. JoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Caffyn v. CaffynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Mattson v. MattsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Filstein v. BrombergNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Estate of PerricelliNew York Surrogate's Court · 2012
  3. Alvarado v. AlvaradoNew York Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Stancil v. StancilNew York Supreme Court · 2015
  5. King v. State of New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API