Legal Opinion

Sorensen v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 29, 2005No. 00-7067-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVAL, Circuit Judge.

The principal question raised by this appeal is whether a notice of appeal from a judgment that, while adverse to the appellant on some claims, is favorable to the appellant on the particular claim in question, serves to appeal from a subsequent amended judgment, which vacates the pri- or favorable judgment on the claim, substituting an adverse judgment in its place. We rule that it does not. A new, or amended, notice of appeal must be filed after entry of the adverse judgment.

Plaintiff Anette Sorensen appeals from several partial judgments and a final judgment against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donald Beason v. United Technologies Corporation, Hamilton Standard DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Columbus Miles v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. J.D. v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. United States Ex Rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ofoedu v. St. Francis Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Wood v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API