Sorensen v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge.
The principal question raised by this appeal is whether a notice of appeal from a judgment that, while adverse to the appellant on some claims, is favorable to the appellant on the particular claim in question, serves to appeal from a subsequent amended judgment, which vacates the pri- or favorable judgment on the claim, substituting an adverse judgment in its place. We rule that it does not. A new, or amended, notice of appeal must be filed after entry of the adverse judgment.
Plaintiff Anette Sorensen appeals from several partial judgments and a final judgment against…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Donald Beason v. United Technologies Corporation, Hamilton Standard DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Columbus Miles v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
3Cited by13 opinions
- J.D. v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States Ex Rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Ofoedu v. St. Francis Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Wood v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.