Legal Opinion

Dvorak v. Dvorak

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2007No. 20060050PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Larry H. Dvorak appealed from a January 25, 2006 order of the district court deciding the Minot Regional Child Support Enforcement Unit (“Unit”), on behalf of Irene M. Howard, was entitled to garnish Dvorak’s interest in the Henry S. & Dorothy F. Dvorak Irrevocable Living Trust (“Trust”), in partial satisfaction of Dvorak’s child support arrearages. A final order directing payment of $36,332.84 by the trustee was entered on May 4, 2006. We conclude Dvorak’s attempt to assign his interest in the Trust to other parties violated N.D.C.C. § 14-09-08.17, and we affirm the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Texas Peanut Farmers, Georgia Peanut Farmers, Alabama Peanut Farmers, South Carolina Peanut Farmers, and Florida Peanut Farmers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Pierce v. Shorty Small's of Branson Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. Zueger v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Marchus v. MarchusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Donlin v. DonlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lynnes v. LynnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. White v. Altru Health SystemNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Christian v. ChristianNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Van Sickle v. Hallmark & Associates, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. North Dakota Department of Labor for the Benefit of Fair Housing of the Dakotas v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API