Donald Beason v. United Technologies Corporation, Hamilton Standard Division
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge.
To resolve this appeal, we must construe a Connecticut statute prohibiting discrimination in employment practices in that state. Statutes are not empty vessels into which courts, under the guise of construing a statute, pour meaning. Not because it would spoil the statute in the same sense as pouring new wine into old wineskins “bursts the skins,” spills the wine and spoils the skins, Mark 2:22 (R.A. Knox), but because it is the obligation of the courts instead to ascertain the legislature’s purpose in enacting the law, as the elected representatives of the people.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Denise Felix, Naomi Felix and Irene Cooper as Administrators of the Estate of Denise Felix v. New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Rio Grande Community Health Center, Inc. v. RullanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- 1256 Hertel Avenue Associates, LLC v. CallowayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- DeAngelo v. Yellowbook Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Hopkins v. New England Health Care Employees Welfare FundDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Gomez v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.