Hartmann v. American Mercury, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Ferdinand Pécora, J.
This is an action for libel. Defendants move under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The grounds urged are that the complaint is insufficient because it has split into four separate causes of action the alleged claim for libel based upon a single publication, and that the alleged defamatory statements are not libelous per se and no special damages are pleaded. In opposition, plaintiff, at the outset, claims that defendants may not make this motion because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Koppel Industrial Car & Equipment Co. v. Portalis & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Fiorello v. New York Protestant Episcopal City Mission SocietyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Klippel v. WeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Lloyd v. T. Hogan & Sons, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. Mason-Moore-Tracy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Kern v. News Syndicate Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Clarson Construction Co. v. VespaNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Richter v. BonoAlbany City Court · 1960