Legal Opinion
People v. Haynes
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1967No. Crim. 2806PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.
Defendant and a codefendant Marguerite Anderson were charged with possession of marijuana for sale, viz., a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11530.5; were convicted by verdict of a jury; moved for a new trial, which was denied; and defendant alone appeals, contending the judgment should be reversed because (1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; (2) statements by the district attorney constituted prejudicial misconduct; and (3) the court erred in refusing an instruction requested by him.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict is determinable on appeal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cary v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Russi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. GambosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Weber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.