Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1969No. Crim. 16244PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

Defendant was charged by information with possession of marijuana (Health & Saf. Code, § 11530) and possession of restricted drugs for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11911). When the cause came on for trial, a hearing was had to determine defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5); by stipulation the court first examined the transcript of the testimony taken at the preliminary hearing then heard testimony of Officer Ridenour and defendant. Upon the sole ground that Ridenour’s informant was a material witness whose identity was not disclosed, the court granted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Priestly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. GroomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. HobbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. State v. BraunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. People v. LingoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. ShipsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API