Hornbeck v. Homeopathic Hospital Association
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Stiftel, Judge:
This is a medical malpractice case. Plaintiff’s amended complaint relies solely on the doctrine of res ipso loquitur. Defendants move for summary judgment claiming that the doctrine of res ipso loquitur is inapplicable under the facts of this case and have filed an affidavit of an anesthesiologist to support their motion, which plaintiff moves to strike because it fails to comply with Superior Court Rule 56 (e), Del. C.
Plaintiff went to the defendant hospital for thle removal of a herniated disc. Prior to the operation on March 2, 1961, plaintiff was. given a spinal injection…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Di Filippo v. PrestonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Crovella v. CochraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Cyr v. GiesenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Howell v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pipers v. RosenowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Lacy v. G.D. Searle & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1984
- Caron v. PrattSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Newhall v. Central Vermont Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975
- McKinney v. ReardonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.