Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Reardon

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 16, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LONGOBARDI, Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this negligence action against Defendant-Physician to recover damages arising from a fall suffered by one of the Plaintiffs. Defendant has moved for partial summary judgment and this is the Court’s decision thereon.

Plaintiff, whose left leg was amputated at the mid-thigh level in December, 1965, was Defendant’s patient prior to the accident. Because he suffered from “phantom pain” in his amputated leg, Plaintiff attended weekly hypnotic group thereapy ses sions conducted by Defendant-Physician from July 16,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robelen Piano Company v. Di FonzoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  2. Levett v. EtkindSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Phillips v. Delaware Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  4. Howard v. Food Fair Stores, New Castle, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  5. Christian v. Wilmington General Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. Roberts v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Pettinaro Construction Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API