Legal Opinion
Bluzebra Technologies, Et Ano. v. Yates, Wood & Macdonald, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 3, 2018No. 77106-0Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
FLED COURT OF APPEALS DIVI STATE OF WASMNGTON 2018 DEC -3 AM 9:22 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON BLUZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES, a division of COPIERS NORTHWEST, No. 77106-0-1 INC., a Washington corporation, DIVISION ONE Respondent, UNPUBLISHED OPINION YATES, WOOD & MACDONALD, INC., a Washington corporation, Appellant. Filed: December 3, 2018 LEACH, J. — Yates, Wood & MacDonald Inc. (Yates) appeals a summary judgment granting four breach of contract claims of BluZebra Technologies (BZ) and dismissing Yates's counterclaims against BZ. BZ claims that Yates did not pay a number of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Mayer v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Interlake Porsche + Audi, Inc. v. BucholzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.