Wolfe v. Brown-Wright Hotel Supply Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtButton, C.J.
Considered as an action of assumpsit for the .reasonable value of goods sold without an agreed price, this case was properly terminated by a nonsuit because there was no evidence of the value of the goods or data from which such value could have been inferred. See Pickert v. Jones, 19 Ga. App. 488 (91 S. E. 908). Of course, a suit on an open account may be maintained for the price of goods sold under a contract where the price has been agreed upon by the seller and purchaser and where the seller has performed his part of the agreement and nothing remains to be done except for the purchaser to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chatham Abattoir & Packing Co. v. Painter Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Maynard v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Thomas N. Baker Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Mill & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- McCoy v. MeadorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Sapp Bros. v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Gage v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Lipsey Motors v. Karp Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Professional Insurance Services, Inc. v. Sizemore Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Advance Tufting, Inc. v. DaneshyarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.