Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Stark
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 18, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2110 to fix and determine compensation for legal services rendered to a party in interest to an estate, Harold Stark appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated July 11, 1995, which, inter alia, granted the motion of the executrix, Rita Stark, to dismiss the petition on the ground that Harold Stark had waived his interest in the estate of Fred Stark.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant.
The petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking to fix his fees and requesting that the fees be paid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Bossom v. BossomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Barry v. BarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Barry v. BarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Estate of HechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
3Cited by8 opinions
- Morrison v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Nigro v. NigroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Racanelli Construction Co. v. Tadco Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Accounting by LeoGrandeNew York Surrogate's Court · 2006
- In re the Estate of MorgenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.