Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Hubbard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtRoache, J.

Debt on three several promissory notes under seal. There were two pleas. On the first, there was issue joined, and no question arises upon it for our consideration. The second plea was as follows:

*207“ And for a further and second plea in this behalf, the said defendant says actio non, because he says that the sole and only consideration of said three several writings obligatory was and is the sale of a certain piece or parcel of land, situate in the county of Tippecanoe, and state aforesaid, to-wit,” &c., “ and at the time of making said notes, said plaintiff agreed to give a warranty deed for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burrows v. YountIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McOsker v. BurrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Gifford v. WilcoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Hatfield v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McFarlan Carriage Co. v. Connersville Wagon Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API